Community & Philanthropic Investments
Corporate investments in communities can be seen from
several angles.
Pure charity
Companies across the world are supporting communities
without expecting any financial benefit. This can be
further divided into cases where companies consciously
or otherwise, get or derive PR mileage (visit any company
to see photographs of communities) and cases where companies
even do not share their identity with the beneficiery
community.
These investments can be one time charity acts e.g.donations
to communities to celebrate local religious festival,
or supporting school gathering for the students from
challenged communities or otherwise ..... or can be
investment in NGO partners to address social issues
like education, water ....
Investment in neighbourhood community
These investments are philanthropic as well
as nonphilanthropic in nature.
e.g. supplying water by tanker to the neighbouring community
can be seen as philanthropic in nature because it will
benefit the community. It can also be a non philanthopic
investment because it may result in companies deriving
goodwill - which is a big asset for companies with manufacturing
facilities in developing zones. It may help companies
get - some activists may say "buy" - peace
...All said and done, it still benefits the community.
Investment in environment conservation including
climate change
Many companies support several local, regional,
national and global issues.
e.g. sensitising school children on environment / climate
change, local bird identification competitions, supporting
wild life, marine life, biodiversity ...climate change
sensitisation and action....
Question : Is planting trees as part of reducing carbon
footprint of employees an act of philanthropy or part
of business process ? Our take is later.
Investment in "Reduce, Reuse, Recycle"
natural resources
Investment in "Reduce, Reuse, Recycle"
of natural resources like water and energy surely benefit
communities at large. Most of the companies also can
not quantify how much benefit the world gets out of
their investments.
Looking at these investments under the philanthropy
banner may not be a correct formula. These should be
seen more from the sustainability agenda.
Investment in institution building
While the earlier generation of corporate support
in education has gone in institution building (e.g.
Tata's have supported founding of Indian
Institute of Science in 1911, Tata
Institute of Social Sciences 1936, Tata
Institute of Fundamental Research in 1945.), the
new generation of companies - including the same companies,
have started supporting university departments or chairs
on special issues ( e.g. Harvard Business School Received
$50
Million Gift from the Tata Trusts and Companies
to fund a new academic and residential building on the
HBS campus in Boston for participants in the School's
broad portfolio of Executive Education programs in 2010
or the same Tata groups investment in JRD
Tata Ecotechnology Centre in India in 1996).
Like education, companies have been supporting the health
sector, by starting hospitals (e.g. Tata's investments
in Tata
Memorial Hospital in 1941 which later got converted
into Tata Memorial Centre as a classic example of public
private partnership or the new Tata
Medical Centre in 2011 ).
The support to educational or health initiatives can
be classified as pure philanthropy.
In the same space (education & health), and the
same country (India), many individuals have started
charitable (?) organisations and are getting direct
and indirect commercial benefits out of these so called
NGOs. The reputation of the NGOs have taken a beating
in this area and fortunately, the government seems to
have at least paper plans of taking necessary steps.
Financial equivalent of "in kind support"
Companies have been donating old computers,
old furniture, and even waste paper to NGOs, and thus
far, most of these investments were not part of the
annual report.
Now with communities and governments demanding corporates
to share their CSR investments, companies will / might
(right or wrong is a debate) start putting a financial
value to these donations and this might soon enter into
audiro's zone.
Afterall there is no rule for equating value to a 5
year old used computer - it may be a waste because the
company might want to get rid of it, or it can have
a minimal value. What is important from the reputation
perspective therefore, is that, companies beome transparent
on the value they attach to each item.
Investment in Social Entreprises
We see this as an emerging area and predict
that companies will start investing in for profit social
enterprises. These investments are beneficial to the
community, as well as add to the bottomline of the companies.
These therefore can not be pure philanthropy. (Announcement
: CSR Consulting will offer Social Entrepreneurs
a platform to present their businesses to social investors.
We will start with countrywise listing and then move
to global listing.)
Philanthropy Search Engine
CSRidentity.com has worked on a search engine which
helps you select companies based on their name, group
name, country, industry and also the philanthropic interest
of the company. The search takes you to the website
of the company for further information.
This search engine is getting operational for philanthropic
initiatives of Global Fortune 500 companies, Forbes
2000 companies and ET 500 companies.
CSR Budget and number of issues
Companies must make efforts to sensitise multiple stakeholders
including their own people, the NGOs, governments, media,
consumers at large etc that their CSR budgets are far
bigger than their philanthropic investments because
CSR runs throgh every business process at every step.
Having said this, it is important that companies must
have sizeable philanthropic investments, anywhere upwards
of 1% PAT. Various governments are now trying to woo
corporates to put more. e.g. there is a move in India
to force companies to set aside at least 2% PAT for
philanthropic initiatives.
Without going in for debates on the percentage points,
here is what CSR Consulting recommends for companies.
Please use local currency units for budget
| Philanthropic budget |
Number of issues |
| Less than 1 million |
One |
| 1 Mn to 10 Mn |
Two to three |
| More than 10 Mn |
Three to five |
| Ideally, companies must invest about
70% of their budget on just one focus area where
they can make sizeable impact and the balance can
be divided into neighbourhood investments or some
requests companies can refuse |
Encourage volunteering for higher involvement and
impact
Companies must have strategic nonfinancial investments
with their NGO partners to bring more out of the same
investments.
At one end, companies must encourage employees to invest
time with communities and at the other, ensure management
development of their NGO partners (e.g. the brand /
product / marketing department can help NGOs market
themselves better, the CFO's office can help companies
invest their corpus ...)
Working on the larger canvas, companies should support
local, regional and national governments with strategic
inputs on areas like financial planning, strategies...
Format for documenting investment in community &
philanthropic initiatives
Community & Philanthropic Investments
Pure charity
One time sponsorships for eventsdonations
Investments in NGOs to address social causes
Investment in environment conservation & enhancement
including climate change
Investments in reduce, reuse & recycle of water
and energy resources
Investments in institutional building
Financial equivalent of in kind support e.g. donation
of computers
Others
Core competency volunteering : Hours
and $ or equivalent currency
Community based volunteering : Hours
and $ or equivalent currency
Stakeholder (Beneficiery Community) meetings
:
Yearly meeting between CSR team &
beneficiery groups without NGO partner
Yearly meeting between CSR team, beneficiery groups,
NGO partners, Other funding partners, media just like
AGM of the company
Programme Documentation
Documentation of success / failures of the
programme as seen by the beneficiery community and other
partners by CSR department, external auditors in text,
audio and video forat
Withdrawl plans
By the company in units of number of years
By the NGO partner in units of number of years
CSR Consulting Services
Identifying issues, NGO partners
Programme documentation
Volunteering Management (Facilitation / Audit)
Research paper on industrywise philanthropic initiatives
Research paper on issuewise philanthropic initiatives
Research paper on countrywise philanthropic initiatives
To know more, mail to Business@CSRidentity.com
|