Nobel's WILL was not accepted initially but it won ultimately.

Bill & Melinda Gates, Warren Buffet : Help others in the world, when you are alive or do it through a WILL like what Giving Pleders started by Bill & Melinda Gates & Warren Buffet says.

Nobel had done WILL 3 times
On November 27, 1895, Alfred Nobel signed his third and last will at the Swedish-Norwegian Club in Paris. When it was opened and read after his death, the will caused a lot of controversy both in Sweden and internationally, as Nobel had left much of his wealth for the establishment of a prize. His family opposed the establishment of the Nobel Prize, and the prize awarders he named refused to do what he had requested in his will. It was five years before the first Nobel Prize could be awarded in 1901.

LEAVE A GIFT IN YOUR WILL
Your generosity can help students receive a world-class education and help us find the answers to global problems through pioneering research.
WILL is used by University of Surreyaed

In India
Family members oppose WILL and go to courts. They even oppose Registered WILL & Registered Gift Deed done by a medically fit person.
Law in democratic countries must stand by truth. And India and Thane should be Global example here.
We share Justice ministries in more than 150 countries because we want them to see how India is protected by law and is not corrupt driven.
Legal case may go on and on and one may be killed directly or through accident. But truth cant be killed.
If born humans kill someone, their future generations, neighbours will badly suffer. Politicians are social professionals & serve people & communities.
And killing some one from the social sector is a social issue which globally must be raised.
Name of killers can be identiried later but it will surely be identified because police are careful caretakers of legal system.

The last word is important.

Survival is great, but remember each human being has expiry date.
WILL & WISH are important because hardly one knows expiry date & time in advance.
And even if they know it, they always WISH that they should live more.

CSRidentity.com founder Sanjay Kumud Moreshwar Bapat survived from an almost fatal accident on 28.08.2013 thanks to Bhau who left this world on 9.2.2015
People responsible for the accident or others who were happy to know about the accident must know that Sanjay is not at all afraid of death. Infact he considers this is BONUS life given to integrate social, health, climate issue related programmes happening in the world.
Thane as well as Maharashtra Police, former collector, local and national politicians know about the accident details.
They will take CARE of the people responsible for another accident or some other things.

Request before you expire
There are more than 1.4 billion below the poverty line (BPL) citizens in most of the countries in this large world.
Please have a will to help at least 1 BPL in your lifetime or after your expiry through a registered WILL or just handwritten but unregistered WILL..

People in middle class or upper middle class or upper class and celebrities can easily take care of 1 BPL citizen in their country or in any other country, specifically African countries or countries which are experiencing large number of migration because citizens in the country face low income, low human rights in the country.
And one can take care of this in financial terms or in non financial volunteering terms.

And yes, dont give money just as a fad or to temporarily remove that person from BPL. Ensure that the person (infact family) gets capacity to earn living and come out of poverty line on a permanent and sustainable basis. Your money must have impact.
In simple words, check, cheque and check.

First check is check whether the concerned person is BPL or ..,
then give cheque (It can be online money transfer to save paper. It is good if money is given in cheque / online format because there is a proof),
the last check is check the impact of money.

And give funds only for 3 years and in these 3 years the implementing agency to which you give funds should ensure Sustainability of the concerned person in terms of livelihood or in case of senior persons or differently abled persons check something else or tell the donor that this person needs support till that persons expiry date.

If 1.4 billion people above the poverty line take care of 1.4 billion people below the poverty line for 3 years, the world will be a great place to live & leave.
Again, it must be your WISH (not a WISH which you had to sign compulsarily or someone dictated you) and WILL (your WILL, again not dicated by circumstamces). Actually it is YOUR WILL and we dont understand why it has to be a registered WILL. Its a human responsibility & human rights issue.

Visitors to CSRidentity.com are human beings and we dont know whether they are great, good, financially corrupt, mentally corrupt, greedy or money oriented.
And we therefore say registered WILL (the registration should be done with the related government office, at least that is the process in India. We dont know about other countries).

We urge celebrities to take care of 1 BPL person when they are alive and one more after their expiry date and the second one must be in the form of a registered WILL.
Celebrities have influencing power and money, so if they take care of 1 BPL and promote related NGOs, then their followers will take care of 1.
So 1.4 billion can be achieved by 2022 (within 3 to 5 years) if all celebrities promote this concept..

We repeat. Remember each human being has expiry date.
World will be a great place to live & leave if you have a clear WILL.
The WILL against povery is a mental WILL and doesnt require registration.
(We have purposely misspelt Poverty. The t is missing and t stands for thinking or it may stand for time.
We know one notices wrong spelling fast. But one does not even think of removing 1 BPL to above the poverty line.
They think it is just government's job because they pay tax.
Wrong spelling shows how people think of poverty and but they still get time to find spelling mistakes.

Its human right to have a WILL.
Relatives, political parties, organisations can influence but personal experiences are deciders of the WILL.

India is our global example, has a population of 1.3 billion plus. Each has a religion, caste ..
but three things which are common in all of them are
1) They are humans
2) They have a will - maybe supressed will
3) Every one has expiry date
Will can be to live lavishly or help society or whatever and there are humans who cant think because they are mentally disabled citizens or citizens in coma.

Does India care for Registered WILL of its citizens ?
How many Indians register their WILL is not known.
We think all democratic countries take legal care of registered WILL.
But this is what we think. Whether its a fact or just thinking is not known.

Founder's experience regarding registered WILL is however different.
It is about a person no more living in this world. While he was alive and was Indian citizen, he had registered his WILL going through required medical tests and the will has a copy of medical doctor who has done relevant medical tests.
But even after 7 years after he expired (and who had registered a WILL earlier than that), if a country like India, can not take care legal decision at district court level (forget about high court or supreme court), then India will surely be questioned of its reputation of a fast decision making democratic country. And it is not about 1 person in this case. It is about more than 1.3 billion citizens living in the country.

But from India's side, we think in a democratic country, people file legal cases on anything and the population and migration to cities is a BIG issue.
So it takes time.

But just think
Doctor can not say wait for 7 years, when a patient who just had a heart attack is taken to the doctor. If there is long queue, doctors or hospitals will say take the patient to a different hospital but say Wait is not at all done. But when there is only one hospital in an entire district, doctors have to take care of the patient who just had a heart attack. So a court at district level must take care of someone from the district who first goes to district court, then high court and then supreme court.

And do compare
If the district is crowded with people, then more than one hospital is built because that is the need of community. So when the district has many million citizens, court either takes more Judges or diverts cases to nearby districts which has less cases. Like a hospital says there are more patients, go to other nearby hospital. Dont we expect that from a doctor or hospital which takes of life of a person ? Courts are life changers, so they are like doctors.

While giving name of a person, we say Advocate Apte or Dr Apte... we never say Engineer Apte or Gold medalist in Medical College or Legal college Apte ..
Doctors and advocates are seen differently by community. So they must act accordingly.

Whether the patient is Supreme court Judge or Political leader or economically middle class or Below the poverty line, for a doctor Its a patient. And Patients must be first.
Does a doctor taking medical care of an accident patient says wait outside for 7 years ?
Does any one in India or anyone in the world likes this concept of a doctor asking you to wait for 7 years before seeing you and giving you treatment ?

To summarise
India has 1/7th of the world population.
And 7 years is tooooooooooooooooooo long a time for court to take a legal decision of a medically fit Indian citizen who had registered his WILL and has expired years ago..

Again : Do courts take such time to take a decision of Registered WILL of a Supreme court judge or Indian Member of Parliament or Justice Minister ?????
And if that person was medically fit person who had great mental power, who was mixing with others till about a fortnight before he expired ... and as per rules, had the doctor do relevant medical test before signing his WILL

We dont know the real reasons of court's delay.
Its not a bad dream, but reality.
But reality is reality.
And it is not at all a good identity of a democratic country.

Yes, Indian courts are right when the legal decisions are same whether you are PM, President or Below the poverty line.

Legal complaints against registered WILL ???????
Its a horrible concept that one files a Legal complaint against a registered WILL of a mentally fit person about his self earned property..
This is what we used to think.
But now we think its right of everyone to file legal cases.

Right or wrong is a court's decision.
Not a mentally fit person's decision because she / he may think it from their perspective.
Law is neutral and every one must respect law.
Judge asking you wrong questions is a test.
Like if they give options in mathematics paper, they give you 4 answers of which only 1 is correct.
It does not mean the question paper setter is wrong. She / he tests your knowledge.

But some people & their lawyers do it & waste WORLD's time, money and most importantly start an unethical practice.
We hope the LAW is clear and takes care of such inhumans and punishes this inhuman behaviour.
Its similar to a WAR against ethics.

And we want Justice Ministry to take care of the image of India.

And we want human rights organisations (not activist organisations) to tell the LAW what the LAW knows well but does not implement in time, THE TRUTH.

YOUR PARENTS.
World will be a greater place to live & leave if you take care of people who gave you birth (your parents).
You may be Queen, King, President, PM, Minister, Scientist, Great doctor or common person. Who has given birth to you ? YOUR PARENTS.

They take care of you when you are a child.
Do respect them and take care of them when they are physically old or when they need it.
Remember medical practices have improved now and one can easily live more.
But agewise everyone gets older if they survive.
If you become old and your child or grand child doesnt take care or bother about you, then what will be your condition.
We have purposely not ended this sentence with question mark (?) because .........

You might beg them to take care of you but if they ask you simple question of "What care you took of your parents ?
If you did not look at them, then on what thinking terms you have the right to tell me to take care of YOU"

And then you have no answer except the fact that you can only repent
(of course if you have moral & ethical values, only then you repent)
Such inhumans will have legal right to play with their grandchildren but absolutely no ethical stand till they expire.

(Note : Like in TV channels, CSRidentity.com must admit that we are not mentioning any names of persons who register a WILL or names of people who are greedy and go to court or names of lawyers who are greedy of either money or friendship or image. If some people think that this is a real STORY based on their real life, they must admit the mistakes in court as well as infront of people of this world).

If you think its your story, then learn from such horrible mistakes and be ready for any right and judicial decisions)

We repeat.
If the world has 7.5 billion plus citizens, then remember they are born to their parents. Then they have parents of those greats who adopt them.
True, poor may not economically take care of their parents but they must take care of the emotions of their parents till they are physically on earth.

Economically one may be Below the Poverty Line citizen but they are billionaires in terms of number of neurons in the brain (in medical terms, remember that rich, poor, middle class .... all humans have an average number of neurons in the brain between 86 billion to 100 billion ... )

Insurance
(This page is about WILL but purposely we share Insurance case on this page).
Now, Sanjay Moreshwar Bapat who had an almost fatal accident on 28.08.2013, was not given an opportunity to share what he, his family, friends, clients .... have gone through in the last few years. It is unacceptable. Again issues like population, more dense population in cities .... must be considered. But 5 years time after 28.8.2013 is unacceptable.

Yes, he stood first time in life in court 29.8.2013.
And the decision was given.

Does the Insurance company wants someone to DIE so that substantial Insurance Money is given ?
Yes, when one fills up insurance company form, it has several clauses but how many people who have signed the form have read & understood the complete rules, regulations ...
Does the insurance agent tell you every thing, specially if you dont die but you had an almost fatal accident, then you will get only .... money.
They must ensure that their clients understood it before signing.

Hardly any insurance agent will ensure that you have completely understood the rules and regulations.
And usually, the insurance agent doesnt ask any questions when a person signs insurance papers.

So like you must answer questions correctly in exams then only you become a doctor .. an insurance agent who is supposed to insure the life of a person must be like a doctor ... But they may be thinking, it is just a formality.
Why is Insurance agent paid for ???

It is the responsibility of the agent to understand whether the person who signs has completely understood what she / he is signing.
The agent must ask questions to check. (Arent there questions at the end of a chapter in school ? We know it is not childish and it is not at all formality. Is insurance a formality.
If Insurance agents think it isa requirement, then it is a school of thought where the curriculum is life driven.

The BIG unanswered questions Sanjay has are : Is Insurance done as a security measure or as Money after death measure ?
Is Term insurance better than life insurance ?
Of course this does not cover good practices of Mediclaims.